This entry was posted
on Monday, March 12th, 2012 at 3:00 pm and is filed under your business online.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
25 Responses to “Rodney Dangerfield’s First Economics Class”
@ForkinCrazy Thank you for wasting the 5 seconds of my life I spent reading your sophmoric response. You make no rational argument. You merely resort to Neanderthalic-means of lobbying personal insults when you have no facts to back up any opinion you might have. Suck on that for a while and see if anything sticks. Snap. Ohhhh snap ForkinCrazy!!
@Srd1126 FACT: NO WMDs were discovered in Iraq; so the intel was WRONG. FACT: Bush said he wanted to get bin Laden…so he went to Iraq (even though bin Laden was in Afghanistan). FACT: Obama’s administration got bin Laden. FACT: Obama created 3 million new jobs and got us OUT of the recession which arose during BUSH’s presidency. FACT: the only person who blindly trusts Fox news is you. Adieu
@Boudosaved FACT: intel showed Iraq was developing WMDs and that is why a majority of congress, including Democrats like Hillary Clinton, voted in favor of invasion. END OF STORY. FACT: nobody said Binb Ladden was in Iraq, not sure of your fascination with claiming someone said he was. FACT: Cheny had a Haliburton Pension but his assets were held in blind trust, hence no direct benefit. FACT: Haliburton was the only US company that could do the job, You are a typical liberal hack. Goodbye
@Srd1126 FACT: you still haven’t proven there were WMD’s in Iraq. FACT: the fact that you are making a mountain out of a distinction between an oil company and an oilfield service company does not take away from the FACT that Haliburton and Cheney benefitted monetarily by being in Iraq even though bin Laden wasn’t there and there was no threat coming from Iraq to the US. FACT: you are typical Republican fear-monger. NEXT!!!!!!!!carpultunnelsyndrome!!!!!!!!!
@Boudosaved FACT: Iraq was in violation of UN Inspections imposed after the Gulf War and intel and their history showed they were trying to get more. Folks like you do not understand in intel you need to base a decison on available information which is never complete. FACT: you claimed Haliburton was there to “take the oil” now even you admit they are not even an oil company. No wonder you are an Obama supporter, you have a 7th grade understanding of geopolitics and the word. NEXT!!!!
@Srd1126 You may have fooled the others, but you don’t fool me. “Fair and balanced.” I should have known you get all of your (mis)information from Fox News. Fact = NO WMDs were found in Iraq. Fact = According to your “logic”, Bush should have also gone after North Korea’s dictator…but didn’t. Hmm. Fact = Haliburton IS an oilfield service company, which was awarded a $7 billion contract that no other company was allowed to bid on in Iraq. NEXT!!
@Boudosaved If Obama was serious he would call for a tax increase on EVERYBODY instead of bragging about how much money he makes. You seem to like higher taxes, right? How much more do YOU WANT TO PAY? Don’t be cheap and greedy, tell me how much more you want to pay?
@Boudosaved he is greedy because he wants higher taxes so he gan give money to peopel who refuse to work. His supporters are cheap and greedy as well, wanting other people to pay higher taxes, never themselves. Iraq uses WMDs on Israel, Iran, and the Kurds and refused inspection to show they were disposed of. Haliburton isn’t even an oil company, genius. Who ever said Bin Laden was in Iraq? Was the Japanese Emporor in Germany in WW2? Read a book, maybe several. Get fair and balanced news.
@Srd1126 How can you call Obama greedy? How does he personally benefit from higher taxes? WMDs??? Now I know you’re being sarcastic. If not, you must be living in bizarro world. Everyone knows no WMDs were found in Iraq. That war was fought so Haliburton (a company Cheney has ties with) could profit by taking the country’s oil. Bin Laden was in Afghanistan, or do you conveniently forget that? NEXT!!!
@Boudosaved uh, CLINTON “dep-regulated” the wall between consumer and investment banking, not Bush. We are NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE A SURPLUS. When you do it means taxes are too high. Obama is among greedy and jealous people who want higher taxes, not a good thing. If Obamna wants to “enter new areas of business” he should have went into the real world, government is not supposed to “go into new areas of business.” Yes, seen WMDs. Iraq used them for years–where were you?
@Srd1126 Bush’s deregulation policies got us into this mess. He inherited a surplus from Clinton and he tanked it. Were you asleep in 2007 when Bush was still President and we entered the Great Recession? During Clinton’s presidency, taxes were at the highest and we still had a SURPLUS. Obama wants the same tax rate. Obama wants to enter into new areas of business, such as alternative fuels such as natural gas, solar, etc. Bush spent a fortune on the war in Iraq. Seen any WMDs?
@Boudosaved No, I am pretty sure Obama is the one who thinks raising taxes is good for the economy; profit is greed; we dont need to drill to find oil; and the puropse of a business is to greate jobs. Pretty sure that the economy was far better under Bush, especially 2002-2006 when things boomed vs now when we only lower unemployment because people are dropping out of the labor force. Pretty sure of all of that.